Information operations · Information Warfare · Russia

Russia Claims Victimhood To Aggression From West And Increases Tanks Facing Poland


Please recognize Russia’s reverse logic.  

Russia holds a number of exercises on their Western border and begins building up their forces arrayed against the West.  The West built up their defenses.  Because the West has built up their defense to stop a Russian invasion, Russia is increasing the number of tanks to head off Western aggression out of Poland.  Yes, that is circular logic, it is illogical because a real buildup would be never-ending. 

The source for this article is Nezavisimaya Gazeta, usually a fair and objective source. 

</end editorial>



Russia has transferred tanks to the border with Poland

Moscow is trying to counteract the plans of NATO to increase the grouping of the alliance in the east

The Russia-NATO summit on Friday, which discussed the implications of the United States denouncing the Medium and Short Range Missile Treaty (INF), confirmed that in the near future Russia will have new security problems. They are connected not only with the dissolution of the INF Treaty, but also with the general mood of the countries of the alliance not to comply with international agreements and withstand Moscow by military means. At the same time, the international Agreement on Adaptation of the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE Treaty) signed in November 1999 is no longer working.

The CFE Treaty has not been ratified by any of the NATO countries. That is, there are no legal obstacles to a significant increase in the military potential of NATO near the Russian borders.

There is reason to believe that the armored battalions deployed by the alliance in 2017 in the Baltic countries on a rotational basis are only a prelude to new steps to militarize the region. While a meeting of the Russian-NATO Council was held in Brussels, Polish Minister of National Defense Mariusz Blaszczak once again declared good prospects for deploying a permanently established US base in his country, known as Fort Trump. At the facility, for the arrangement of the infrastructure of which Warsaw is ready to allocate $ 2 billion, an American armored division should be placed. That is, more than 15 thousand US troops and almost 1,000 units of armored vehicles (including 290 Abrams M1A1 tanks). Plus 112 helicopters, almost half of which are Apache fire support vehicles, as well as Black Hawk multi-purpose helicopters and the like.

According to the adapted CFE Treaty, Poland can have 1,730 tanks on its territory and only 130 attack helicopters. But its, not American. Thus, if the US division in Poland is stationed on a permanent basis, this will contradict not only the adapted CFE Treaty, but also the agreements of Russia and NATO, which prohibit concentrating the troops of the alliance near the borders of the Russian Federation on a permanent basis. Meanwhile, Mariusz Blaszczak on Telewizja Polska on Friday said that “negotiations with the United States on the stationing of a permanent military base in Poland are in a good atmosphere, and the expansion of the American military presence in the republic already concerns when it comes to that.”

In addition to the topic of deploying the US base in Western media, another idea of ​​the country’s leadership is being actively discussed – the formation of the 18th Mechanized Division in the Polish Army, which will include at least 300 tanks according to NATO standards. There will be three brigades in the division staff, two of which already exist. Their deployment is envisaged in the regions adjacent to the borders with the Baltic countries – members of NATO, and in the Kaliningrad sector. A motorized infantry brigade (with headquarters in Lublin, Poland) will be formed by 2022. One of the battalions of this brigade (tank), equipped with Leopard tanks, air defense divisions and self-propelled artillery, Warsaw plans to deploy in the village of Biala Podlaska, where there is a military airfield. It is only about 40 km from the Belarusian Brest. The battalion will cover the route going from Berlin through Warsaw to Brest, Minsk and Moscow. The nearby airfield will provide air support to the troops. Thus, in NATO, a NATO tank arm is formed from more than 2,000 tanks, not counting other armored vehicles, which, if summed up, significantly surpass the Belarusian army in combat potential. Judging by the official data, no more than 300 tanks remained in its structure, and the Soviet period.

As the Ministry of Defense of Belarus recently reported, in November 2018, only 10 T-72B3 tanks modernized in Russia came into service with its army. Another 10 tanks for Minsk will be upgraded in 2019.

The situation is similar with Russian troops stationed at the borders of NATO countries in the Western Military District. The media reported that the 11th Army Corps of the Coastal and Land Forces of the Baltic Fleet stationed in the Kaliningrad Region was reinforced by a tank regiment (TP). The number of tanks and their type is not specified. Usually such a regiment has no more than 90 tanks. The location of the TP is the city of Gusev (30 km from the border with Poland and a little more from the border with Lithuania). According to open data, the 79th Separate Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade, which has a tank battalion (usually 40 tanks), is stationed here. Thus, the entire tank group in the Kaliningrad region has no more than 130 tanks.

“Russia and Belarus are forced to strengthen their troops in the west,” said Lieutenant-General Yuri Netkachev, a military expert who, during Soviet times, commanded a tank army in Belarus. – Now the Union State has no such military potential as before, when there was the Soviet Union. The Russian-Belarusian group is purely defensive in nature. At the same time, NATO forces are building up their offensive potential, which testifies to their aggressive designs and Russia’s mistrust. Under these conditions, Moscow and its allies should strengthen their defense by increasing the military budget. But this is not their choice, but a necessary measure related to the plans of the alliance to change the balance of forces in Eastern Europe in their favor. ”

Source: http://www.ng.ru/politics/2019-01-27/1_7492_nato.html

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Russia Claims Victimhood To Aggression From West And Increases Tanks Facing Poland

  1. Can they really not see that they are the aggressor and that they act proactively all the time? Do they really think they are victims? If I knew the answer to that I would be inside their sphere of decision.

  2. Roger, I have spoken with many Russian self-proclaimed propagandists. I’ve traded emails with the likes of Igor Panarin. I’ve read all I could…

    Let’s just say Russian propagandists have woven an intricate Russian truth which explains and justifies everything they do or say. At some point reality is dismissed and the Russian alternate reality is what they spend their time justifying. This may account for the seeming Russian obsession with conspiracy theories. The crazier the better.

    Do they believe they’re really victims? Perhaps, but it works to support everything they do. That is why, several weeks ago, I wrote a blog about, “A List Of Russian Aggressions For The Past 12 Years” )https://toinformistoinfluence.com/2019/01/16/a-list-of-russian-aggressions-for-the-past-11-years). It is my sincere hope that this list is expanded and can become a resource for proving that Russia’s behavior is out of line. I also hope it can be used as a justification for removing Russia’s right to Veto on the UN Security Council.

    Furthermore, from a Russian perspective, it makes perfect sense. Having an external enemy to blame everything on furthers their cause. The UK and the US are their “enemies”, blame everything on them. This is why we seldom hear about the spoke in Terrorist phone threats called in all across Russia. But loud and clear we hear about Ukraine, UK, NATO, and US “provocations”. Putin and gang can just point out the window and say “Look how aggressive the US is. Look, the USS Cook is in the Black Sea, threatening our shores, the Russian people.” RT, Sputnik, they’re all full of stories blaming us for all their woes.

    But this smugness comes at a price. Disapproval of Putin now hovers at 54%, according to Levada. People are starting to recognize he is toxic. Furthermore, they realize that Putiin’s pals are all corrupt beyond reason. There is rich, then there is oligarch rich – tons of money they could never spend in two lifetimes. You’ve heard the story that Putin demands 50% of the Oligarch’s ill-gotten gains, so Putin is worth an estimated $200+ Billion? In light of present day, it doesn’t make sense for Putin to be pushing for “President for Life” or even Tsar status, but he is. If that passes, he’ll never get to enjoy his wealth.

    Russia is just strange… understanding it is even more difficult. To see it clearly fling some paint against the wall. Then look at it and squint your eyes. That is the clear picture…

    1. Mr. Joel Harding, what you are saying gives the clear picture that there is no clear picture. You are the closest to the truth anyone has come outside of Russia. You seem very knowledgable and intelligent. I guess you are up there in age?

      Anyway, I am an author and also the defense political Spokesman for the Christian Values Party (Kristna Värdepartiet) in Sweden. Unfortunately it is a very small party. If you ever need something that is in my power to give you don’t hesitate to ask! I am so glad I have found this site, it is everything that I am. You have my e-mail address? I have yours.

      If you ever are in the south of Sweden (Scania) feel free to look me up, maybe I can accommodate you so that you have somewhere to stay during your visit. I am the only Roger Klang in Lund, Scania. There are about five Roger Klang in Sweden and five more in the United States, but that’s about it.

      P.S. I decided to make this text overt, since I supposedly am a politician.

      Roger

Comments are closed.