Paul Goble wrote a piece titled “Russians Dismiss Estonian Claim that a Russian Attack would Fail in Tallinn” about an interview that Politico’s Molly McKew wrote after interviewing Colonel Riho Uhtegi, Commander of the Estonian Special Forces.
Towards the end of the report, he cites a response by Russia’s
“Vladimir Shamanov, head of the Duma defense committee, for example, calls Uhtegi’s remarks “the words of a mad man” and says his place should not be “in the armed forces or some other structure but in a mental hospital” “
Paul Goble then correctly characterizes Shamanov’s words, Molly McKew then tweets Paul’s characterization.
This looks at Russian response to my recent Politico piece, noting in particular:
1 – response “verges on the hysterical”
2 – shows Moscow has enormous confidence that NATO will defend Estonia/Baltics
3 – Russian military has developed plans to seize Estonia if ordered anyway
John Schindler responded that Molly McKew is the new “it” girl when it comes to pissing off the Russians.
Even more noteworthy was some Russian idiot’s response, which Molly proceeded to squash.
Go, Molly! By the way, I consider Molly a friend. Friends like this are good to find!
I can only imagine the spittle flying from Vladimir Shamanov’s mouth as he wrote his words… “Crazy Ivan” warning applicable.
Paul Goble’s insightful article follows. I also consider Paul a friend.
Friday, July 13, 2018
Russians Dismiss Estonian Claim that a Russian Attack would Fail in Tallinn
Staunton, July 12 – Colonel Riho Uhtegi the commander of Estonia’s special forces, told a Western outlet this week that any Russian invasion of Estonia might reach Tallinn in two days but that it would “die” in the Estonian capital because Estonian special forces and the united Estonian people would cut its supply lines and make a further advance impossible.
He told Politico’s Molly K. McKew Estonians are constantly talking about what a Russian invasion would be like. People say, “yeah, the Russian can get to Tallinn in two days … Maybe” as it is only 125 miles from the Russian border. “But they can’t get all of Estonia in two days” (politico.com/magazine/story/2018/07/10/they-will-die-in-tallinn-estonia-girds-for-war-with-russia-218965).
Russian invaders may get to the Estonian capital in two days, he acknowledges. “But they will die in Tallinn. And they know this” because the entire Estonian people will rise against them, destroying their lines of communication and supply and forcing the Russian forces first to stop and then retreat.
Uhtegi sees the Georgian case in 2008 as instructive: “You know why the Russians didn’t take Tbilisi in 2008? They were just up the road, 50 kilometers of so, and nothing was stopping them.” But they stopped because the “Georgians are crazy and they would fight. The idea of this unwinnable asymmetric fight in Tbilisi was not so appealing to the Russians.”
Estonia’s defensive doctrine rests on General Order No. 1 that Aleksandr Einseln, the Estonian-American who served in the US military before returning to his homeland in the 1990s to take command of the Estonian Defense Forces. That order specifies that in the event of an invasion, the country’s military is to resist the invader without waiting for orders.
More than that, Estonian citizens both those organized in the Kaitseliit guard as well as ordinary Estonians are to fight as well. They will focus on defending their local communities against both hybrid and direct threats. Such defense, Uhtegi says, “is very local … This village. This town. This bridge. This river. This piece of land. It’s theirs to defend.”
But in defending these parts, they defend the whole and would make it impossible for Russia to sustain any invasion – by raising the price for Moscow to a point that Russian leaders would find unsustainable. “I don’t know what it would be like if the Russians really start to fight … Just that every Estonian will fight” back.
Not surprisingly, Russian officials are having none of this. Vladimir Shamanov, head of the Duma defense committee, for example, calls Uhtegi’s remarks “the words of a mad man” and says his place should not be “in the armed forces or some other structure but in a mental hospital” (stoletie.ru/lenta/estonija_predrekla_rossijskoj_armii_gibel_v_talline_430.htm).
Konstantin Sivkov, vice president of the Russian Academy of Rocket and Artillery Science, says that “the very idea of ‘the seizure of Estonia by Russia’ is a fantasy.” Any military conflict with NATO would “instantly” escalate into a nuclear war “in the course of which Estonia would simply disappear” (vz.ru/politics/2018/7/11/556525.html).
If by some miracle the conflict didn’t go nuclear, Sivkov continues, Russian forces are sufficient to achieve its primary goal: creating a land corridor to the exclave of Kaliningrad. If these forces were directed to take Tallinn as part of that, the Estonian capital “would be seized not in two days but in one. Estonia doesn’t have any army to speak of.”
The Estonian military numbers 6400 effectives in the regular forces, he says In addition, there are 15,800 members of the regional defense forces or Kaitseliit. Uhtegi’s suggestion that they and the population could cut Russian supply lines in the event of an invasion is simply “unserious.”
The only real obstacle to a potential Russian advance, the Moscow analyst says, is the presence of NATO forces. Without them, a single Russian division would be sufficient to occupy Estonia; with them, a far larger force would be required. And it would need “two weeks or more” to complete the job.
Yury Melkonov of Latvia’s military historical journal Baltfort agrees, arguing that Russia could use its superiority in the air and on the sea to ensure that it could continue any advance its forces were ordered to make. Tallinn could be taken but it is not the primary target for Russia which would be concerned about security ports and coastline.
Uhtegi’s declaration, he argues, is “the ordinary rhetoric of military personnel,” adding that any Estonian officer who makes such claims does himself and his country no honor. Russia isn’t planning to invade Estonia, and Estonians and their friends should know that. Russians will come as visitors not invaders, he says.
As for the timing of Uhtegi’s remarks, Konstantin Zatulin of the Duma’s CIS committee suggests that this is all about sending a message to the Trump-Putin summit that will take place in Helsinki less than 100 kilometers from the Estonian capital and that nothing more should be read into the declaration.
Three things are interesting about the Russian response. First, it verges on the hysterical. Second, it shows that Moscow has enormous confidence that NATO will defend Estonia and other member states. And third, it shows that despite that confidence, the Russian military has developed plans for seizing Estonia if so ordered.