There are some major problems with this article.
Brett Bruen, who served as the White House director of global engagement from 2013 to 2015, says the Obama administration could have “thwarted” Russian trolls. They produced some fact sheets and videos and claimed success.
In return, his effort was labeled a ‘recreation’ of the old USIA by officials who should have known better.
I’m here to tell you, it is almost impossible to suppress individual trolls, including the ones from the Russian troll farm in St. Petersburg. There are no tools that can do that. Trolls don’t read what you write, they don’t care about the facts, they don’t care what argumentative technique you use, and they don’t care about your well-crafted narrative. They are trolls and by definition they will do whatever it takes to suppress your speech, divert your attention away from the main issue, make you blanch with disgust, shock you into silence, insult you to the point where you cringe, or just make you surrender as you are buried under a mountain of copy and pastes. I’ve seen it all and wondered why in the heck would somebody act like the world’s biggest A-hole.
Quite simply trolls have a job to do and they do it very well. They are ugly, vicious, mean, insulting, vulgar, offensive, ill-mannered, and relentless. In other words, figuratively they will kick you in the face and body repeatedly, rip your head off your shoulders, and then use that hole in your neck as a toilet. Yes, that is nasty but I’ve seen it done. Yes, I’m the guy who runs towards the sound of gunfire. I also sought out trolls for years, spoke with them, reported them, tried to argue, tried to stop them, tried to identify them, I tried everything. As a result, I am banned from LinkedIn, I do not like to make my profile public on Facebook, I am still identifying folks who have blocked me on LiveLeak, and I tend to rip people’s heads off if they start off a comment with “your an idiot”. It’s you’re, not your, dumbass.
This is all made worse because they are anonymous or have a completely fake profile.
So what can be done about trolls?
Notadamnthing. Nothing moral or ethical can take out individual trolls.
Anything beyond that would require a Presidential finding. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Now… I’m not talking about propaganda, fake news, disinformation, or misinformation. That can be dealt with and everything is ethical, moral, and legal. …but I’m not sharing, apologies. I do have a plan, I’ve written it up, and hopefully, it uses the right words and we’ll be allowed to start countering foreign propaganda until certain rogue states just stop.
Updated 9:14 PM ET, Mon March 26, 2018
The Kremlin-linked troll group, known as the Internet Research Agency, was charged last month by special counsel Robert Mueller.
Brett Bruen, who served as the White House director of global engagement from 2013 to 2015, said he warned colleagues on President Barack Obama’s National Security Council in 2014 that America would be targeted by Russian trolls. His warnings came after he saw how the Russians used the same methods — social media meddling and propaganda — to sow discord during Ukraine’s election in 2014.
“I was sitting in the Situation Room saying, ‘Why do we continue to look at this as an issue that only concerns Ukraine, that only concerns Eastern Europe? This is something that’s going to march across Western Europe. This is something that’s going to march over to our shores, and we need to be ready,’ ” Bruen told CNN.
Bruen said he took part in a US government task force to counter the Russian meddling in Ukraine’s election. That task force produced fact sheets and videos in response to Russian content and was considered a success, Bruen said. “We actually saw that the Russian bots and the Russian propagandists receded because we were contesting this space, because we were pushing out some pretty effective content.”
On the heels of that achievement, in late 2014, Bruen pitched an idea to set up a command center at the US State Department that would similarly track and counter any Russian propaganda targeted at US allies, but officials at State, he said, failed to recognize the threat.
Bruen said State Department officials, and in particular, Victoria Nuland, then the assistant secretary of state for the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, did not recognize the danger and dismissed his ideas.
Nuland told CNN that achieving what Bruen proposed would have required additional funding from the White House.
“My memory is that Bruen wanted essentially to re-create the old USIA (US Information Agency), but there were no resources for that. The White House wasn’t going to approve funding,” she said. “We were operating on a shoestring budget as it was.”
“The thinking was to counter this by giving the truth to news outlets rather than just producing more propaganda,” Nuland added.
While a half dozen former State Department and NSC officials who spoke to CNN all agreed more should have been done to counter Russian misinformation in the lead-up to the 2016 election, they disagreed on what tactics could or should have been implemented to deter it.
“I would have loved to have had more support for that from all across government, not just from the State Department but from the intelligence and defense communities as well,” said Rick Stengel, the State Department’s undersecretary of state for public affairs under Obama.
“But even today, I’m not sure that there is an effective way of countering, much less thwarting, disinformation and propaganda. And if there is, I haven’t heard of it,” he said.
Another person who served on the NSC at the time said she was not convinced that Bruen’s proposed plan on its own would have thwarted Internet Research Agency activity aimed at the US.
“What we needed, and still don’t have, is an analytic cell that sees the full scope of Russian activity. Our inability to put the full picture together in real time was a major part of why this was missed,” said the person, who did not want to speak publicly so as to not jeopardize her current position at a nongovernmental organization.
A plot to spread distrust
By the time Bruen had made his proposal to the National Security Council, the Internet Research Agency’s plans to meddle in American life through social media were well underway. According to Mueller’s indictment, in the spring of 2014, the agency, which was run by a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, had set up a group that would use social media platforms like YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter to target the 2016 US presidential election.
The stated goal: Spread “distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general.”
It was the early stages of a scheme that would eventually run for years and cost millions, involving the creation of fake accounts and personas designed to look like they were run by real American activists pushing messages on divisive issues including race, religion and politics.
By the time the Republican and Democratic conventions were taking place in July 2016, more than 80 people at the agency were assigned to meddling in American life, according to Mueller’s February indictment
of the Internet Research Agency.
Bruen said US officials who worked on the Ukraine task force were specifically aware of the Internet Research Agency’s strategy and had his pitch of a propaganda monitoring system been implemented it would have caught content targeting Americans.
Bruen acknowledged that much of the administration’s efforts at the time were focused on combating the rise of ISIS and countering that group’s propaganda online, and said there were “enormous threats that were sucking up the attention” of the intelligence community.
The existence of the Internet Research Agency was hardly a secret.
In June 2014, BuzzFeed reported
on a cache of emails leaked from the agency that showed how the troll group had hijacked the comments sections of popular American websites. A year later, The New York Times profiled the group
and its attempts to “wreak havoc” in real-life American communities.
But even by October 2016, a month before the election, the US government did not appear to take the threat seriously.
“We fully recognized Russians were using social media. We believed their use of it was largely based on trolls and probing acts to get information. At that point, we didn’t really see it as a calculated and willful effort to use social media to communicate with groups and do a call for action,” a highly placed intelligence source told CNN.
In January, CIA Director Mike Pompeo said he had “every expectation”
that Russia would try to interfere in the upcoming 2018 midterm elections.
FBI Director Christopher Wray said the agency has set up a “foreign influence taskforce” that would aim to prevent interference in the 2018 and 2020 elections.
But some efforts appear to be in vain. Earlier this month, The New York Times reported
that the State Department had yet to spend any of the $120 million it had allocated since late 2016 to counter foreign election meddling efforts.
US Cyber Command chief Adm. Mike Rogers told lawmakers last month
that he has not been granted the authority by President Donald Trump to disrupt Russian election hacking operations where they originate.