This story would not be getting headlines if it was not CNN, did not involve the President Trump administration, and ‘the media’ and especially CNN is widely believed to be fabricating many news stories.
Why is CNN holding their reporters and editorial staff accountable?
- Perhaps CNN is sending a signal to its reporting and editorial staff: write straight news. Doubtful, but that’s their story.
- Perhaps CNN is telling the same folks there is an editorial process you must follow and the those involved did not follow that process on this story. Equally doubtful.
- Perhaps CNN is doing its utmost to restore faith in CNN as a good news reporting network. Close, but it doesn’t feel quite right. They are losing current and potential sponsors, their business model is failing, and they cannot continue to bleed money.
Far Right Wing source, but it might be worth noting.
- Project Veritas Undercover Investigation: CNN Producer Admits Network Hyping ‘Mostly Bullsh*t’ Trump-Russia Scandal for …
As for the reporters, it seems they are outraged they are being held to a professional standard. …but there have been few if any professional standards in such a long time at any left-leaning mainstream media. Or, the most likely scenario, the reporters reputedly “resigned”, as in they were requested/told to resign.
The issue is the target of the hit piece, Anthony Scaramucci, denies any Russian collusion or meetings.
There are now two ways to view this dead horse of a story, which was beaten into submission on the first day.
- There were meetings with the Russians, despite no evidence, and denials by Scaramucci.
- There were no meetings, covert or otherwise, putting yet another nail in the coffin of the liberal media’s rabid witch hunt and dogged pursuit, based on emotions alone, of the Trump administration.
Good journalism has died. Long live journalism.
Three CNN journalists who worked on a now-retracted story about Russia and a top Trump adviser are leaving the network.
CNN is casting their departure as resignations in the wake of the fiasco, but the network has come under substantial criticism since apologizing for the story. The move would also help CNN’s legal position in case of a lawsuit.
Anthony Scaramucci, the Trump adviser who is the target of the story, told me that he has no plans to sue. He said he has accepted CNN’s apology and wants to move on.
But Scaramucci also told me in an earlier interview, “I was disappointed the story was published. It was a lie.”
Lex Harris, executive editor of CNN’s investigative unit, was the highest-ranking official to resign. Thomas Frank, who wrote the story, and Eric Lichtblau, who edited it, also turned in their resignations. Lichtblau is a highly regarded reporter who spent nearly a decade and a half at the New York Times.
The story tried to draw a link between Scaramucci and the Russian Direct Investment Fund. Scaramucci was a Trump transition team member who has been nominated to an ambassadorial-level post based in Paris.
The CNN.com article said that Scaramucci, back in January, held a secret meeting with an official from the Russian fund. According to an unnamed source, Scaramucci discussed the possibility of lifting U.S. sanctions at the meeting.
But Scaramucci told me there was no secret meeting. He said he had given a speech on Trump’s behalf at Davos, and fund official Kirill Dmitriev approached him in a restaurant to say hello and they had a brief conversation, with no discussion of sanctions.
In the retraction, the network said the story “did not meet CNN’s editorial standards.” The network is now requiring approval from two top editors before any Russia-related story can be published.
Howard Kurtz is a Fox News analyst and the host of “MediaBuzz” (Sundays 11 a.m.). He is the author of five books and is based in Washington. Follow him at @HowardKurtz. Click here for more information on Howard Kurtz.